Grouping parantheses instead of capturing parantheses
authorrebeka-catalina <github@rct.in-berlin.de>
Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:14:35 +0000 (16:14 +0100)
committerrebeka-catalina <github@rct.in-berlin.de>
Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:14:35 +0000 (16:14 +0100)
nsfw/README

index e42c2128c7e05e0770663746a2035be8113a2236..89dbec011b3a888a751990424e09efe44d0b8288 100755 (executable)
@@ -47,7 +47,25 @@ done with a single regex, which matches all of them:
 Another use case could be, that you are simply not
 interested in postings about christmas.
 
-       /christmas([-_ ]?(tree|time|eve|pudding))?/
+       /christmas([-_ ]?(?:tree|time|eve|pudding))?/
+
+
+ATTENTION:
+
+It is absolutely important, that you use grouping
+parantheses instead of capturing parantheses!!
+
+Grouping parantheses are:
+
+       (?: )
+
+If you use capturing parantheses, which are
+
+       ( )
+
+it will produce errors and the regex won't work and
+at least your targets will not get collapsed.
+
 
 
 3)